
Nearly every guide to journalism ethics says anonymous quotes should be avoided. So when I saw Medill Dean John Lavine had used three of them in two columns for Medill magazine, I was surprised.
One quote, in last spring's issue, is attributed to a Medill junior in last winter's "Advertising: Building Brand Image" class, which designed a marketing campaign to discourage drunk driving among teenagers.
The quote reads: "I came to Medill because I want to inform people and make things better. Journalism is the best way for me to do that, but I sure felt good about this class. It is one of the best I've taken, and I learned many things in it that apply as much to truth-telling in journalism as to this campaign to save teenage drivers."
I see no reason for the quote to be anonymous. Many newspapers print their rationale for granting anonymity, but there was no such explanation here.
The phrasing also struck me as odd, and an instructor at Medill, who insisted upon remaining anonymous for fear of retaliation, told me that Lavine often uses the phrase "sure felt good" colloquially. I searched my e-mail and found one message the dean sent to Medill students, dated Oct. 23, 2007, that contained the phrase "we sure want you to know."
Still, these suspicions hardly amount to evidence of the quote's inauthenticity. So I contacted all 29 students in the class, reading the quote and asking whether they said it. (Only five were Medill juniors.)
All the students denied saying the quote, even when I promised not to print their names.
I sat down with the dean and asked for his explanation. In a tape-recorded interview, he told me the quote had come from an e-mail, but when I gave him the class list he could not identify who sent it. "Whether they remember it or not, or told you or not, I see so many of these (e-mails) that I often don't remember," Lavine said. "I wouldn't have quoted it if I didn't have it."
He said he could not find the student to ask permission to print his or her name. (The dean did not indicate the student's gender.) He also said he would not have asked if he could, because attributing quotes in this context would be less necessary than in more traditional forms of journalism.
"The point was not in this instance that you said it, or she said it, or someone else said it," he said. "The point was, this is an opinion, these are feedback I got."
In his columns, the dean has used two other anonymous quotes - attributed to "one student" and "one sophomore," with no further details given - but none in which he named the student or explained why the quote was anonymous.
We cannot be certain these quotes were fabricated. But at the very least, I find reason to be suspicious.
Medill senior David Spett can be reached at
d-spett@northwestern.edu.
Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 42
Angelica
posted 2/11/08 @ 1:58 AM CST
Very thought provoking- I'll be interested to see what other professors say.
John Walker
John Walker
posted 2/11/08 @ 11:54 AM CST
David,
Nice investigative reporting.
It makes me sad to think that the dean you refer to in your article believes that he was correct and justified in fabricating quotes to sell his pet program?s message. (Continued…)
LTodd
posted 2/11/08 @ 1:10 PM CST
Well this column pretty much reaffirms my decision to give money to the Daily instead of Medill.
Good work Spett.
Alex
posted 2/11/08 @ 1:59 PM CST
If I've learned anything at my TM site, it's to keep all your emails and make a record of your sourcing for questions just like this. Shouldn't the dean of Medill not only espouse but practice these standard behaviors as well? Even a Medill turned more towards marketing is going to have to address the truth somewhat (that's why those drug commercials have all those disclaimers!) Dean Lavine, I hope you're reading the Daily and have a logical response for why you keep quoting anonymous sources -- because I took that course and it certainly doesn't sound like anyone I know. (Continued…)
Neutral on Lavine...Until Now
posted 2/11/08 @ 3:37 PM CST
Forget Integrated Marketing or revamping and wanting to re-name Medill. I had no problem with Lavine until now. Honestly?! I'm embarassed to be under this guy's jurisdiction. (Continued…)
Dan Strumpf
posted 2/11/08 @ 3:55 PM CST
Wow. Nice job, David. The dean, at the very least has some explaining to do.
David Murphy
posted 2/11/08 @ 4:00 PM CST
You know, had the Dean some kind of--say--blog, perhaps he could use that to offer some kind of supporting evidence, or at least an explanation regarding this rather obvious discrepancy. (Continued…)
Nomaan
posted 2/11/08 @ 4:10 PM CST
It's nice to see someone's willing to question Medill publicly, especially since so many students and professors won't ("for fear of retaliation," of course -- I've heard that one a few times). (Continued…)
former alum
posted 2/11/08 @ 4:13 PM CST
kudos david ... let's get this into romenesko!
Amanda
posted 2/11/08 @ 6:10 PM CST
I love how even when outright confronted, Lavine, true to form, still has the ability to spin and spin until it sounds OK. The man can spin ANYTHING to make it sound good, and I'm guessing that when confronted about this column, he'll do the same thing again. (Continued…)
Post a Comment